Model profile

FramePack AI video generator

An open long-video/image-to-video technique that compresses frame context to extend generation length.

Should You Use FramePack?

Use it for: long-video experiments, image-to-video research, open workflow testing

Skip or compare first if: Better treated as a method/workflow than a standalone commercial model. Needs active maintenance review.

Positioning: An open long-video/image-to-video technique that compresses frame context to extend generation length.

Top Capabilities

  • Frame-context packingFramePack targets longer video generation by packing frame context efficiently.Source
  • Primary source-backed profileFramePack has an official source, repository, paper, or model card attached for verification.Source
  • Open/self-hosted access pathFramePack can be evaluated through open code, weights, or model-card resources when license terms allow.Source

Company Snapshot

Company profile is not yet attached to this model.

Price, Access, Open Status

Access: Open Weights, Research Only

Open/closed: Open. Open code, weights, or model-card resources are listed; verify license terms before commercial use.

Open/self-hosted; cost depends on hardware and integrated model.

Price, regional access, and commercial terms need a live check before cost-sensitive recommendations.

Latest Version

FramePack

2025 / partial

Community release focused on longer video generation workflows.

Latest News

FramePack GitHub repository

2026 / lllyasviel GitHub

External source link for this model.

Open original

Why It Ranks Here

Rank: #40 51

Score source: Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection.. Evidence confidence is medium.

Rankings Methodology

Key Score Drivers

These are the scoring dimensions most responsible for the current ranking position.

  • Model Quality Proxy: 60Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection.
  • Ecosystem Popularity: 100GitHub snapshot includes 1 repo(s), 17,161 stars, 1,731 forks, 486 open issues, latest pushed 2025-10-16T01:28:50Z.
  • Capability Depth: 56Supported workflow tags: i2v, long_video, open_weights. Depth rewards T2V/I2V/V2V, references, native audio, editing, API, and open weights where present.
  • Source Confidence: 74Profile source confidence is partial with 1 official URL(s), 1 feature evidence item(s), SEO present, GitHub present.

Alternatives And Comparisons

Use these when price, access, output style, or workflow fit is uncertain.

  • SeedanceByteDance's frontier video generation family for multimodal, audio-video, short-form, and cinematic creator workflows.View modelCompare
  • KlingKuaishou's broad AI video and image generation platform for text-to-video, image-to-video, native audio, references, and creator effects.View modelCompare
  • PixVerseA creator-friendly AI video platform with strong API coverage for text-to-video, image-to-video, transitions, extension, and reference fusion.View modelCompare
  • ViduShengShu Technology's video model family for native audio-video storytelling, image-to-video, and scene-oriented short-form production.View modelCompare

What It Is

Primary content is rendered into static HTML.

FramePack is an open community project from lllyasviel focused on longer video generation using frame-context packing. It is a method and workflow direction more than a polished consumer model.

For the benchmark site, include FramePack under open/research because long-video continuity is one of the most important evaluation dimensions for future AI video tools.

Version Progress

  • 2025 / partial / partialFramePackCommunity release focused on longer video generation workflows.

Open / Source Evidence

Status: Open

Open code, weights, or model-card resources are listed; verify license terms before commercial use.

Latest News

Model-specific news entries link directly to the original publisher; article bodies stay off-site.

Full Score Breakdown

Weighted evidence dimensions separate model quality from access, web authority, ecosystem, and source confidence. See methodology and rankings.

DimensionScoreWeightEvidenceConfidence
Model Quality Proxy 60 24% Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. low
Missing: live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality
Capability Depth 56 16% Supported workflow tags: i2v, long_video, open_weights. Depth rewards T2V/I2V/V2V, references, native audio, editing, API, and open weights where present. medium
Missing: hands-on feature verification, mode-specific limits by duration/resolution
Access And Pricing 30 12% Access types: open_weights, research_only. Pricing note: Open/self-hosted; cost depends on hardware and integrated model. low
Missing: current free tier, normalized price per video minute
Version Maturity 28 12% 1 version/history entries in the profile; latest public date is 2025. medium
Missing: automated release-note monitor, model ID/version mapping across providers
Ecosystem Popularity 100 10% GitHub snapshot includes 1 repo(s), 17,161 stars, 1,731 forks, 486 open issues, latest pushed 2025-10-16T01:28:50Z. high
Missing: Hugging Face downloads/likes, Replicate/fal usage/runs
Web Authority 28 10% SEO snapshot found product domain github.com and company domain unknown; sampled sitemap URL count is unknown.

No public source link is attached yet.

medium
Missing: Similarweb/API traffic, Tranco rank
Company Distribution 30 10% Company profile is missing; distribution score is provisional. low
Missing: app store ratings/review volume, product MAU/traffic
Source Confidence 74 6% Profile source confidence is partial with 1 official URL(s), 1 feature evidence item(s), SEO present, GitHub present. medium
Missing: paid/API evidence refresh, manual output review artifacts

Limitations And Pricing

Open/self-hosted; cost depends on hardware and integrated model.

  • Better Treated As A Method/Workflow Than A Standalone Commercial Model.
  • Needs Active Maintenance Review.

Sources