排名

AI 视频模型排名 - 2026-08-01

48 个模型/产品 × 评分维度 × 公开证据. Updated 2026-08-01. Score formula: model_quality_proxy 24% + capability_depth 16% + access_and_pricing 12% + version_maturity 12% + ecosystem_popularity 10% + web_authority 10% + company_distribution 10% + source_confidence 6%.

选出适合你的 AI 视频生成器

Start with the use case, then use the full ranking to check score, access, evidence coverage, and tradeoffs.

最值得先试的 Top 5

The five highest-ranked options are shown here before the full 48 model table.

排名 1

Seedance

ByteDance's frontier video generation family for multimodal, audio-video, short-form, and cinematic creator workflows.

适合用途: cinematic short clips, multi-shot storytelling, audio-video generation

92
排名 2

Kling

Kuaishou's broad AI video and image generation platform for text-to-video, image-to-video, native audio, references, and creator effects.

适合用途: consumer creator workflows, native audio clips, storyboarded short video

92
排名 3

LTX Video

Lightricks' open-weight and productized video model family, notable for synchronized audio-video generation and production-oriented open deployment.

适合用途: open-weight audio-video, local deployment, custom LoRA workflows

89
排名 4

Wan

Alibaba's open and commercial video model family, with strong community adoption and variants for text, image, speech, and animation-driven video.

适合用途: open-weight benchmarking, developer workflows, image-to-video

87
排名 5

Runway Gen

A mature creative video generation platform and model family for production-style image-to-video, text-to-video, editing, and workflow automation.

适合用途: production workflows, image-to-video, video editing

87

完整 48 模型排名

48 个模型/产品按总分排序. Formula: model_quality_proxy 24% + capability_depth 16% + access_and_pricing 12% + version_maturity 12% + ecosystem_popularity 10% + web_authority 10% + company_distribution 10% + source_confidence 6%.

排名说明: This ranking is not a final measure / true market share, revenue, or absolute output quality. Scores are affected by public evidence coverage, paid API availability, live benchmark gaps, current pricing, regional access, and source freshness. Provisional entries are kept visible and labeled while live benchmark, pricing, region, and paid API data are collected.

RankProduct / 模型公司Score开源/闭源适合用途参数细节排名理由覆盖度 / 可信度
1 Seedance
排名 1 / 48
ByteDance 92
Strong matched external evidence: Artificial Analysis and Arena snapshots place Seedance 2.0 near the top; Vercel AI Ga...
Closed cinematic short clips, multi-shot storytelling, audio-video generation, reference-guided video
Quality 96 x 24%
Features 100 x 16%
Maturity 97 x 12%
Price/access 88 x 12%
Web authority 100 x 10%

排名 1 reflects an overall score / 92. Strong matched external evidence: Artificial Analysis and Arena snapshots place Seedance 2.0 near the top; Vercel AI Gateway snapshot shows leading video usage share. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 96 and Features 100. Quality is scored at 96 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 100, mainly from T2v, I2v, V2v. Price/access is 88; current access is Closed Web, Closed Api, Aggregator. Ecosystem heat is 68. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 100, with 36803 sampled sitemap URLs as a public visibility signal. 公司 distribution is 80, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 100; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality.

source-backed / high confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; hands-on feature verification
2 Kling
排名 2 / 48
Kuaishou 92
External leaderboard coverage is strong, with Arena snapshot listing Kling v3 near leading I2V systems and Artificial A...
Closed consumer creator workflows, native audio clips, storyboarded short video, reference control
Quality 91 x 24%
Features 97 x 16%
Maturity 100 x 12%
Price/access 88 x 12%
Web authority 100 x 10%

排名 2 reflects an overall score / 92. External leaderboard coverage is strong, with Arena snapshot listing Kling v3 near leading I2V systems and Artificial Analysis tracking Kling variants. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 91 and Features 97. Quality is scored at 91 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 97, mainly from T2v, I2v, Reference To Video. Price/access is 88; current access is Closed Web, Closed Api, Aggregator. Ecosystem heat is 68. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 100, with 7959 sampled sitemap URLs as a public visibility signal. 公司 distribution is 88, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 100; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality.

source-backed / high confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; hands-on feature verification
3 LTX Video
排名 3 / 48
Lightricks 89
LTX has open repository evidence and third-party catalogue/leaderboard presence; live score snapshots are required for...
Open weights open-weight audio-video, local deployment, custom LoRA workflows, API video generation
Quality 79 x 24%
Features 100 x 16%
Price/access 96 x 12%
Maturity 96 x 12%
Ecosystem 100 x 10%

排名 3 reflects an overall score / 89. LTX has open repository evidence and third-party catalogue/leaderboard presence; live score snapshots are required for exact rank. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 79 and Features 100. Quality is scored at 79 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 100, mainly from T2v, I2v, V2v. Price/access is 96; current access is Open 权重s, Closed Api, Closed Web. Ecosystem heat is 100. Because it is open, GitHub activity and the self-hosting ecosystem help the ecosystem score. SEO/web authority is 85, with 402 sampled sitemap URLs as a public visibility signal. 公司 distribution is 62, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 100; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality.

source-backed / high confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; hands-on feature verification
4 Wan
排名 4 / 48
Alibaba Group 87
Wan appears in Artificial Analysis and Arena snapshots, and the open repository/paper provide reproducible public evide...
Open weights open-weight benchmarking, developer workflows, image-to-video, animation and character replacement
Quality 92 x 24%
Features 76 x 16%
Maturity 99 x 12%
Price/access 88 x 12%
Ecosystem 100 x 10%

排名 4 reflects an overall score / 87. Wan appears in Artificial Analysis and Arena snapshots, and the open repository/paper provide reproducible public evidence. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 92 and Features 76. Quality is scored at 92 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 76, mainly from T2v, I2v, Ti2v. Price/access is 88; current access is Open 权重s, Closed Api, Aggregator. Ecosystem heat is 100. Because it is open, GitHub activity and the self-hosting ecosystem help the ecosystem score. SEO/web authority is 59. 公司 distribution is 88, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 100; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality.

source-backed / high confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; hands-on feature verification
5 Runway Gen
排名 5 / 48
Runway 87
Runway has mature product evidence and public leaderboard presence; exact current model rank needs live leaderboard col...
Closed production workflows, image-to-video, video editing, keyframes
Quality 81 x 24%
Features 100 x 16%
Maturity 100 x 12%
Price/access 88 x 12%
Web authority 96 x 10%

排名 5 reflects an overall score / 87. Runway has mature product evidence and public leaderboard presence; exact current model rank needs live leaderboard collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 81 and Features 100. Quality is scored at 81 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 100, mainly from T2v, I2v, V2v. Price/access is 88; current access is Closed Web, Closed Api, Aggregator. Ecosystem heat is 68. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 96, with 476 sampled sitemap URLs as a public visibility signal. 公司 distribution is 62, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 100; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality.

source-backed / high confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; hands-on feature verification
6 Veo
排名 6 / 48
Google DeepMind 86
Google Gemini Omni Flash/Veo-family entries lead the Artificial Analysis audio-video snapshot and rank highly in Arena/...
Closed cinematic generation, image-referenced clips, vertical short-form video, Google ecosystem users
Quality 95 x 24%
Features 78 x 16%
Maturity 96 x 12%
Web authority 94 x 10%
Price/access 78 x 12%

排名 6 reflects an overall score / 86. Google Gemini Omni Flash/Veo-family entries lead the Artificial Analysis audio-video snapshot and rank highly in Arena/Vercel snapshots. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 95 and Features 78. Quality is scored at 95 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 78, mainly from T2v, I2v, Ingredients To Video. Price/access is 78; current access is Closed Web, Closed Api. Ecosystem heat is 68. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 94, with 315 sampled sitemap URLs as a public visibility signal. 公司 distribution is 80, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 100; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality.

source-backed / high confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; hands-on feature verification
7 PixVerse
排名 7 / 48
PixVerse 86
PixVerse variants appear in Artificial Analysis and Arena snapshots; V6 official samples and API docs support current c...
Closed fast creator clips, first-last-frame transitions, video extension, reference fusion
Quality 87 x 24%
Features 93 x 16%
Maturity 89 x 12%
Price/access 88 x 12%
Web authority 100 x 10%

排名 7 reflects an overall score / 86. PixVerse variants appear in Artificial Analysis and Arena snapshots; V6 official samples and API docs support current capability claims. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 87 and Features 93. Quality is scored at 87 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 93, mainly from T2v, I2v, Transition. Price/access is 88; current access is Closed Web, Closed Api, Aggregator. Ecosystem heat is 68. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 100, with 1359 sampled sitemap URLs as a public visibility signal. 公司 distribution is 62, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 100; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality.

source-backed / high confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; hands-on feature verification
8 Luma Ray
排名 8 / 48
Luma AI 85
Arena snapshot places Luma Ray 3 in the top-ten I2V region; official Ray docs support high-control workflow evidence.
Closed cinematic clips, multi-keyframe direction, professional pipelines, HDR/EXR workflows
Quality 82 x 24%
Features 100 x 16%
Maturity 100 x 12%
Price/access 78 x 12%
Web authority 90 x 10%

排名 8 reflects an overall score / 85. Arena snapshot places Luma Ray 3 in the top-ten I2V region; official Ray docs support high-control workflow evidence. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 82 and Features 100. Quality is scored at 82 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 100, mainly from T2v, I2v, V2v. Price/access is 78; current access is Closed Web, Closed Api. Ecosystem heat is 68. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 90, with 162 sampled sitemap URLs as a public visibility signal. 公司 distribution is 62, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 100; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality.

source-backed / high confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; hands-on feature verification
9 HunyuanVideo
排名 9 / 48
Tencent 84
HunyuanVideo is tracked by public leaderboards and has strong open-weight repository evidence, but current frontier pla...
Open weights open-weight testing, developer experiments, self-hosted video generation, avatar and I2V research
Quality 80 x 24%
Maturity 99 x 12%
Features 73 x 16%
Price/access 88 x 12%
Ecosystem 100 x 10%

排名 9 reflects an overall score / 84. HunyuanVideo is tracked by public leaderboards and has strong open-weight repository evidence, but current frontier placement needs live collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 80 and Maturity 99. Quality is scored at 80 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 73, mainly from T2v, I2v, Avatar Video. Price/access is 88; current access is Open 权重s, Closed Web, Aggregator. Ecosystem heat is 100. Because it is open, GitHub activity and the self-hosting ecosystem help the ecosystem score. SEO/web authority is 59. 公司 distribution is 88, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 100; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality.

source-backed / high confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; hands-on feature verification
10 SkyReels
排名 10 / 48
Skywork AI / Kunlun 84
SkyReels has open-weight evidence and public model-host presence, with exact live leaderboard position still pending.
Open weights keyframe generation, video extension, reference control, open-model experiments
Quality 77 x 24%
Features 100 x 16%
Price/access 100 x 12%
Ecosystem 100 x 10%
Maturity 76 x 12%

排名 10 reflects an overall score / 84. SkyReels has open-weight evidence and public model-host presence, with exact live leaderboard position still pending. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 77 and Features 100. Quality is scored at 77 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 100, mainly from T2v, I2v, Keyframes. Price/access is 100; current access is Open 权重s, Closed Web, Closed Api, Aggregator. Ecosystem heat is 100. Because it is open, GitHub activity and the self-hosting ecosystem help the ecosystem score. SEO/web authority is 59. 公司 distribution is 62, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 100; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality.

source-backed / high confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; hands-on feature verification
11 Grok Imagine Video
排名 11 / 48
xAI 81
Arena snapshot lists xAI Grok Imagine Video near the top / I2V, but exact live rank and API availability need collecti...
Closed image-to-video with audio, fast mobile generation, Grok users, short creative clips
Quality 88 x 24%
Features 96 x 16%
Maturity 86 x 12%
Price/access 78 x 12%
Ecosystem 68 x 10%

排名 11 reflects an overall score / 81. Arena snapshot lists xAI Grok Imagine Video near the top / I2V, but exact live rank and API availability need collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 88 and Features 96. Quality is scored at 88 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 96, mainly from I2v, V2v, Video Editing. Price/access is 78; current access is Closed Web, Closed Api. Ecosystem heat is 68. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 62, with 7 sampled sitemap URLs as a public visibility signal. 公司 distribution is 62, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 100; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality.

source-backed / high confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; hands-on feature verification
12 Hailuo
排名 12 / 48
MiniMax 79
MiniMax Hailuo 2.3 appears in Arena snapshot and has official release notes for motion and start/end-frame improvements.
Closed fast short clips, complex motion, image-to-video, start-end frame control
Quality 85 x 24%
Maturity 100 x 12%
Features 72 x 16%
Price/access 88 x 12%
Ecosystem 68 x 10%

排名 12 reflects an overall score / 79. MiniMax Hailuo 2.3 appears in Arena snapshot and has official release notes for motion and start/end-frame improvements. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 85 and Maturity 100. Quality is scored at 85 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 72, mainly from T2v, I2v, First Last Frame. Price/access is 88; current access is Closed Web, Closed Api, Aggregator. Ecosystem heat is 68. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 59. 公司 distribution is 62, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 100; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality.

source-backed / high confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; hands-on feature verification
13 Adobe Firefly Video
排名 13 / 48
Adobe 79
Adobe Firefly Video has strong official product and enterprise evidence; external neutral video ranking still requires...
Closed commercial-safe video, brand and marketing clips, Adobe ecosystem users, prompt-to-video
Quality 76 x 24%
Features 78 x 16%
Price/access 88 x 12%
Maturity 83 x 12%
公司 reach 88 x 10%

排名 13 reflects an overall score / 79. Adobe Firefly Video has strong official product and enterprise evidence; external neutral video ranking still requires collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 76 and Features 78. Quality is scored at 76 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 78, mainly from T2v, I2v, Reference Video. Price/access is 88; current access is Closed Web, Closed Api, Aggregator. Ecosystem heat is 68. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 63, with 30 sampled sitemap URLs as a public visibility signal. 公司 distribution is 88, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 100; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality.

source-backed / high confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; hands-on feature verification
14 Vidu
排名 14 / 48
ShengShu Technology 79
Vidu Q3 Pro is represented in Arena snapshot among top I2V systems, and official Q3 pages document native audio-video p...
Closed native audio-video stories, short drama clips, narrative ads, multi-speaker scenes
Quality 89 x 24%
Features 78 x 16%
Price/access 88 x 12%
Maturity 81 x 12%
Ecosystem 68 x 10%

排名 14 reflects an overall score / 79. Vidu Q3 Pro is represented in Arena snapshot among top I2V systems, and official Q3 pages document native audio-video positioning. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 89 and Features 78. Quality is scored at 89 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 78, mainly from T2v, I2v, Native Audio. Price/access is 88; current access is Closed Web, Closed Api, Aggregator. Ecosystem heat is 68. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 59. 公司 distribution is 62, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 100; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality.

source-backed / high confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; hands-on feature verification
15 CogVideoX
排名 15 / 48
Zhipu AI / THUDM 75
CogVideoX is a strong open baseline with paper/repository evidence; current commercial leaderboard relevance is lower.
Open weights open-source benchmarking, self-hosted T2V, self-hosted I2V, academic comparisons
Quality 74 x 24%
Maturity 97 x 12%
Features 67 x 16%
Ecosystem 100 x 10%
Price/access 70 x 12%

排名 15 reflects an overall score / 75. CogVideoX is a strong open baseline with paper/repository evidence; current commercial leaderboard relevance is lower. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Maturity 97 and Ecosystem 100. Quality is scored at 74 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 67, mainly from T2v, I2v, Open 权重s. Price/access is 70; current access is Open 权重s, Aggregator. Ecosystem heat is 100. Because it is open, GitHub activity and the self-hosting ecosystem help the ecosystem score. SEO/web authority is 38. 公司 distribution is 62, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 100; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Features 67 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

source-backed / high confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; hands-on feature verification
16 HappyHorse
排名 16 / 48
Alibaba Group 75
Arena snapshot lists Alibaba HappyHorse among the strongest I2V labs, but first-party product documentation remains thi...
Closed benchmark tracking, image-to-video, native-audio model watchlist, Alibaba ecosystem monitoring
Quality 87 x 24%
Features 69 x 16%
Maturity 76 x 12%
公司 reach 88 x 10%
Price/access 70 x 12%

排名 16 reflects an overall score / 75. Arena snapshot lists Alibaba HappyHorse among the strongest I2V labs, but first-party product documentation remains thinner. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 87 and Maturity 76. Quality is scored at 87 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 69, mainly from I2v, T2v, Native Audio. Price/access is 70; current access is Closed Api, Aggregator. Ecosystem heat is 68. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 38. 公司 distribution is 88, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 95; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Features 69 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

source-backed / high confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; hands-on feature verification
17 Sora
排名 17 / 48
OpenAI 74
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Closed historical frontier comparison, audio-video generation, physics-heavy prompts, world simulation
Quality 55 x 24%
Features 81 x 16%
Maturity 99 x 12%
Price/access 78 x 12%
公司 reach 80 x 10%

排名 17 reflects an overall score / 74. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Features 81 and Maturity 99. Quality is scored at 55 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 81, mainly from T2v, I2v, Native Audio. Price/access is 78; current access is Closed Web, Closed Api. Ecosystem heat is 68. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 57, with 34 sampled sitemap URLs as a public visibility signal. 公司 distribution is 80, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 100; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 55 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

source-backed / high confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
18 Pika
排名 18 / 48
Pika 73
Pika has public product/review evidence and some leaderboard/catalogue presence, but current rank requires live collect...
Closed social video effects, quick ideation, image animation, stylized clips
Quality 75 x 24%
Features 73 x 16%
Maturity 84 x 12%
Price/access 70 x 12%
Ecosystem 68 x 10%

排名 18 reflects an overall score / 73. Pika has public product/review evidence and some leaderboard/catalogue presence, but current rank requires live collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 75 and Maturity 84. Quality is scored at 75 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 73, mainly from T2v, I2v, Effects. Price/access is 70; current access is Closed Web, Aggregator. Ecosystem heat is 68. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 59. 公司 distribution is 62, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 95; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality.

source-backed / high confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; hands-on feature verification
19 Haiper
排名 19 / 48
Haiper 67
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Closed consumer video generation, keyframe workflows, video enhancement, API experiments
Quality 66 x 24%
Features 80 x 16%
Price/access 78 x 12%
Ecosystem 68 x 10%
公司 reach 62 x 10%

排名 19 reflects an overall score / 67. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Features 80 and Price/access 78. Quality is scored at 66 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 80, mainly from T2v, I2v, Keyframes. Price/access is 78; current access is Closed Web, Closed Api. Ecosystem heat is 68. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 52. 公司 distribution is 62, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 83; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 66 and Ecosystem 68 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / high confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
20 Stable Video Diffusion
排名 20 / 48
Stability AI 67
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Open weights historical baseline, open image-to-video, research comparison
Quality 64 x 24%
Ecosystem 100 x 10%
Web authority 92 x 10%
Features 53 x 16%
Maturity 63 x 12%

排名 20 reflects an overall score / 67. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Ecosystem 100 and Web authority 92. Quality is scored at 64 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 53, mainly from I2v, Open 权重s. Price/access is 48; current access is Open 权重s, Research Only, Aggregator. Ecosystem heat is 100. Because it is open, GitHub activity and the self-hosting ecosystem help the ecosystem score. SEO/web authority is 92, with 238 sampled sitemap URLs as a public visibility signal. 公司 distribution is 46, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 98; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 64 and Features 53 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
21 Mochi
排名 21 / 48
Genmo 67
Mochi has reproducible open-weight evidence and community adoption; current frontier leaderboard data remains sparse.
Open weights open-source benchmarking, local text-to-video, community fine-tuning, academic tests
Quality 70 x 24%
Ecosystem 100 x 10%
Features 56 x 16%
Price/access 70 x 12%
Maturity 63 x 12%

排名 21 reflects an overall score / 67. Mochi has reproducible open-weight evidence and community adoption; current frontier leaderboard data remains sparse. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Ecosystem 100. Quality is scored at 70 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 56, mainly from T2v, Open 权重s, Lora. Price/access is 70; current access is Open 权重s, Aggregator. Ecosystem heat is 100. Because it is open, GitHub activity and the self-hosting ecosystem help the ecosystem score. SEO/web authority is 28. 公司 distribution is 62, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 100; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Features 56 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

source-backed / high confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; hands-on feature verification
22 Krea Video
排名 22 / 48
Krea 67
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Closed multi-model comparison, consumer model discovery, creative iteration, restyle workflows
Quality 69 x 24%
Features 65 x 16%
Web authority 100 x 10%
Price/access 62 x 12%
公司 reach 62 x 10%

排名 22 reflects an overall score / 67. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Web authority 100. Quality is scored at 69 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 65, mainly from T2v, I2v, Extend. Price/access is 62; current access is Closed Web, Aggregator. Ecosystem heat is 54. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 100, with 1070 sampled sitemap URLs as a public visibility signal. 公司 distribution is 62, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 87; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 69 and Features 65 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

source-backed / high confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
23 Cosmos
排名 23 / 48
NVIDIA 66
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Open weights physical AI, robotics simulation, synthetic data, world-model research
Quality 72 x 24%
Ecosystem 100 x 10%
Web authority 100 x 10%
Features 40 x 16%
公司 reach 62 x 10%

排名 23 reflects an overall score / 66. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Ecosystem 100 and Web authority 100. Quality is scored at 72 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 40, mainly from World Generation, Video Generation, Simulation. Price/access is 50; current access is Open 权重s, Closed Api, Research Only. Ecosystem heat is 100. Because it is open, GitHub activity and the self-hosting ecosystem help the ecosystem score. SEO/web authority is 100, with 11225 sampled sitemap URLs as a public visibility signal. 公司 distribution is 62, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 94; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Features 40 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
24 MuseSteamer
排名 24 / 48
Baidu 64
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Closed China market coverage, Baidu ecosystem, cloud API tracking
Quality 64 x 24%
Features 59 x 16%
Price/access 78 x 12%
公司 reach 70 x 10%
Ecosystem 68 x 10%

排名 24 reflects an overall score / 64. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Price/access 78. Quality is scored at 64 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 59, mainly from T2v, I2v, Video Generation. Price/access is 78; current access is Closed Api, Closed Web. Ecosystem heat is 68. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 59. 公司 distribution is 70, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 79; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 64 and Features 59 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
25 Leonardo Motion
排名 25 / 48
Leonardo Ai 64
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Closed image-to-video for creators, design concept animation, Leonardo ecosystem users
Quality 65 x 24%
Features 71 x 16%
Price/access 88 x 12%
Ecosystem 68 x 10%
Maturity 48 x 12%

排名 25 reflects an overall score / 64. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Price/access 88. Quality is scored at 65 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 71, mainly from T2v, I2v, Animation. Price/access is 88; current access is Closed Web, Closed Api, Aggregator. Ecosystem heat is 68. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 35. 公司 distribution is 54, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 91; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 65 and Ecosystem 68 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
26 MiracleVision
排名 26 / 48
Meitu 63
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Closed visual design workflows, image-video creation, China-market coverage
Quality 62 x 24%
Price/access 70 x 12%
Web authority 80 x 10%
Features 45 x 16%
公司 reach 70 x 10%

排名 26 reflects an overall score / 63. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Web authority 80. Quality is scored at 62 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 45, mainly from Image Generation, Video Generation, Video Editing. Price/access is 70; current access is Closed Web, Closed Api. Ecosystem heat is 68. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 80, with 29 sampled sitemap URLs as a public visibility signal. 公司 distribution is 70, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 79; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 62 and Features 45 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
27 PrunaAI p-video
排名 27 / 48
Pruna AI 62
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Closed API catalogue tracking, model optimization watchlist
Quality 61 x 24%
Features 59 x 16%
Web authority 87 x 10%
Price/access 62 x 12%
公司 reach 62 x 10%

排名 27 reflects an overall score / 62. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Web authority 87. Quality is scored at 61 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 59, mainly from T2v, I2v, Audio To Video. Price/access is 62; current access is Closed Api, Aggregator. Ecosystem heat is 54. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 87, with 93 sampled sitemap URLs as a public visibility signal. 公司 distribution is 62, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 75; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 61 and Features 59 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
28 Higgsfield
排名 28 / 48
Higgsfield 61
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Closed camera-move templates, social video, character creator clips
Quality 67 x 24%
Web authority 100 x 10%
Features 57 x 16%
Price/access 52 x 12%
Ecosystem 54 x 10%

排名 28 reflects an overall score / 61. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Web authority 100. Quality is scored at 67 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 57, mainly from I2v, Camera Control, Templates. Price/access is 52; current access is Closed Web. Ecosystem heat is 54. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 100, with 822 sampled sitemap URLs as a public visibility signal. 公司 distribution is 54, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 67; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 67 and Features 57 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
29 Hailuo Live
排名 29 / 48
MiniMax 60
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Closed image animation, stylized I2V, character movement
Quality 71 x 24%
Price/access 70 x 12%
Features 45 x 16%
Ecosystem 68 x 10%
公司 reach 62 x 10%

排名 29 reflects an overall score / 60. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. Quality is scored at 71 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 45, mainly from I2v, Stylized Video. Price/access is 70; current access is Closed Web, Closed Api. Ecosystem heat is 68. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 59. 公司 distribution is 62, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 67; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Features 45 and Ecosystem 68 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
30 DomoAI
排名 30 / 48
DomoAI 60
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Closed video-to-video stylization, anime transformations, social clips
Quality 60 x 24%
Web authority 100 x 10%
Features 59 x 16%
Price/access 52 x 12%
Ecosystem 54 x 10%

排名 30 reflects an overall score / 60. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Web authority 100. Quality is scored at 60 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 59, mainly from V2v, Style Transfer, I2v. Price/access is 52; current access is Closed Web. Ecosystem heat is 54. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 100, with 794 sampled sitemap URLs as a public visibility signal. 公司 distribution is 54, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 75; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 60 and Features 59 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
31 VideoCrafter
排名 31 / 48
Ailab Cvc 57
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Open weights research baselines, open T2V, open I2V
Quality 57 x 24%
Features 67 x 16%
Ecosystem 100 x 10%
Maturity 61 x 12%
证据 confidence 90 x 6%

排名 31 reflects an overall score / 57. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Ecosystem 100. Quality is scored at 57 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 67, mainly from T2v, I2v, Open 权重s. Price/access is 30; current access is Open 权重s, Research Only. Ecosystem heat is 100. Because it is open, GitHub activity and the self-hosting ecosystem help the ecosystem score. SEO/web authority is 28. 公司 distribution is 30, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 90; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 57 and Features 67 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
32 Open-Sora
排名 32 / 48
Hpcaitech 56
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Open weights open research, training experiments, benchmark baselines
Quality 61 x 24%
Features 70 x 16%
Ecosystem 100 x 10%
Maturity 48 x 12%
证据 confidence 78 x 6%

排名 32 reflects an overall score / 56. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Ecosystem 100. Quality is scored at 61 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 70, mainly from T2v, I2v, Open 权重s. Price/access is 30; current access is Open 权重s, Research Only. Ecosystem heat is 100. Because it is open, GitHub activity and the self-hosting ecosystem help the ecosystem score. SEO/web authority is 28. 公司 distribution is 30, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 78; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 61 and Maturity 48 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
33 Kaiber
排名 33 / 48
Kaiber 55
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Closed music videos, beat-sync visuals, visual remixing, stylized creative videos
Quality 58 x 24%
Web authority 79 x 10%
Features 40 x 16%
Price/access 52 x 12%
Ecosystem 54 x 10%

排名 33 reflects an overall score / 55. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Web authority 79. Quality is scored at 58 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 40, mainly from Image To Video, Audio Reactive Video, Video Remix. Price/access is 52; current access is Closed Web. Ecosystem heat is 54. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 79, with 24 sampled sitemap URLs as a public visibility signal. 公司 distribution is 54, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 75; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 58 and Features 40 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
34 EasyAnimate
排名 34 / 48
Alibaba Pai 55
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Open weights open generation framework, T2V/I2V experiments, community workflows
Quality 58 x 24%
Features 78 x 16%
Ecosystem 99 x 10%
证据 confidence 74 x 6%
Web authority 38 x 10%

排名 34 reflects an overall score / 55. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Features 78 and Ecosystem 99. Quality is scored at 58 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 78, mainly from T2v, I2v, Video Editing. Price/access is 30; current access is Open 权重s, Research Only. Ecosystem heat is 99. Because it is open, GitHub activity and the self-hosting ecosystem help the ecosystem score. SEO/web authority is 38. 公司 distribution is 30, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 74; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 58 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
35 Agnes Video
排名 35 / 48
Sapiens AI 54
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Closed watchlist tracking, leaderboard monitoring
Quality 63 x 24%
Features 55 x 16%
Price/access 56 x 12%
Maturity 47 x 12%
Ecosystem 54 x 10%

排名 35 reflects an overall score / 54. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. Quality is scored at 63 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 55, mainly from T2v, Native Audio. Price/access is 56; current access is Closed Api, Aggregator. Ecosystem heat is 54. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 28. 公司 distribution is 52, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 67; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 63 and Features 55 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
36 Movie Gen
排名 36 / 48
Meta 54
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Research research context, personalized-video comparison, video editing benchmarks
Quality 73 x 24%
Features 59 x 16%
Ecosystem 54 x 10%
公司 reach 54 x 10%
证据 confidence 87 x 6%

排名 36 reflects an overall score / 54. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. Quality is scored at 73 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 59, mainly from T2v, Personalized Video, Video Editing. Price/access is 6; current access is Research Only. Ecosystem heat is 54. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 52. 公司 distribution is 54, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 87; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Features 59 and Ecosystem 54 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
37 Open-Sora-Plan
排名 37 / 48
Pku Yuangroup 53
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Open weights open research, historical benchmark baselines
Quality 59 x 24%
Features 70 x 16%
Ecosystem 100 x 10%
证据 confidence 74 x 6%
Price/access 30 x 12%

排名 37 reflects an overall score / 53. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Ecosystem 100. Quality is scored at 59 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 70, mainly from T2v, I2v, Open 权重s. Price/access is 30; current access is Open 权重s, Research Only. Ecosystem heat is 100. Because it is open, GitHub activity and the self-hosting ecosystem help the ecosystem score. SEO/web authority is 28. 公司 distribution is 30, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 74; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 59 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
38 AnimateDiff
排名 38 / 48
Animatediff Community 52
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Open weights motion modules, community workflows, stylized animation
Quality 55 x 24%
Ecosystem 100 x 10%
Features 45 x 16%
Maturity 58 x 12%
证据 confidence 94 x 6%

排名 38 reflects an overall score / 52. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Ecosystem 100. Quality is scored at 55 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 45, mainly from Image Animation, Motion Module, Open 权重s. Price/access is 30; current access is Open 权重s, Research Only. Ecosystem heat is 100. Because it is open, GitHub activity and the self-hosting ecosystem help the ecosystem score. SEO/web authority is 28. 公司 distribution is 30, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 94; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 55 and Features 45 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
39 Pyramid Flow
排名 39 / 48
Pyramid Flow Team 52
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Open weights open research, T2V/I2V baseline tests
Quality 57 x 24%
Features 67 x 16%
Ecosystem 100 x 10%
证据 confidence 74 x 6%
Price/access 30 x 12%

排名 39 reflects an overall score / 52. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Ecosystem 100. Quality is scored at 57 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 67, mainly from T2v, I2v, Open 权重s. Price/access is 30; current access is Open 权重s, Research Only. Ecosystem heat is 100. Because it is open, GitHub activity and the self-hosting ecosystem help the ecosystem score. SEO/web authority is 28. 公司 distribution is 30, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 74; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 57 and Features 67 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
40 FramePack
排名 40 / 48
Lllyasviel 51
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Open weights long-video experiments, image-to-video research, open workflow testing
Quality 60 x 24%
Ecosystem 100 x 10%
Features 56 x 16%
证据 confidence 74 x 6%
Price/access 30 x 12%

排名 40 reflects an overall score / 51. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Ecosystem 100. Quality is scored at 60 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 56, mainly from I2v, Long Video, Open 权重s. Price/access is 30; current access is Open 权重s, Research Only. Ecosystem heat is 100. Because it is open, GitHub activity and the self-hosting ecosystem help the ecosystem score. SEO/web authority is 28. 公司 distribution is 30, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 74; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 60 and Features 56 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
41 Lumiere
排名 41 / 48
Google Research 50
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Research research history, space-time diffusion context, video editing research
Quality 68 x 24%
Features 65 x 16%
Ecosystem 54 x 10%
Web authority 52 x 10%
证据 confidence 83 x 6%

排名 41 reflects an overall score / 50. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. Quality is scored at 68 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 65, mainly from T2v, I2v, Stylization. Price/access is 6; current access is Research Only. Ecosystem heat is 54. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 52. 公司 distribution is 20, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 83; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 68 and Features 65 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
42 ToonCrafter
排名 42 / 48
Tooncrafter Team 48
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Open weights cartoon interpolation, anime-style animation, specialized I2V
Quality 53 x 24%
Ecosystem 100 x 10%
Features 48 x 16%
证据 confidence 74 x 6%
Price/access 30 x 12%

排名 42 reflects an overall score / 48. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Ecosystem 100. Quality is scored at 53 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 48, mainly from I2v, Interpolation, Animation. Price/access is 30; current access is Open 权重s, Research Only. Ecosystem heat is 100. Because it is open, GitHub activity and the self-hosting ecosystem help the ecosystem score. SEO/web authority is 28. 公司 distribution is 30, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 74; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 53 and Features 48 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
43 Allegro
排名 43 / 48
Rhymes Ai 48
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Open weights open-model tracking, research comparison
Quality 54 x 24%
Ecosystem 90 x 10%
Features 53 x 16%
证据 confidence 74 x 6%
Price/access 30 x 12%

排名 43 reflects an overall score / 48. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Ecosystem 90. Quality is scored at 54 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 53, mainly from T2v, Open 权重s. Price/access is 30; current access is Open 权重s, Research Only. Ecosystem heat is 90. Because it is open, GitHub activity and the self-hosting ecosystem help the ecosystem score. SEO/web authority is 28. 公司 distribution is 30, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 74; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 54 and Features 53 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
44 Text2Video-Zero
排名 44 / 48
Picsart Ai Research 47
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Open weights historical research, training-free T2V comparison
Quality 45 x 24%
Ecosystem 100 x 10%
Features 45 x 16%
证据 confidence 90 x 6%
Maturity 38 x 12%

排名 44 reflects an overall score / 47. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Ecosystem 100 and 证据 confidence 90. Quality is scored at 45 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 45, mainly from T2v, Research Only. Price/access is 30; current access is Open 权重s, Research Only. Ecosystem heat is 100. Because it is open, GitHub activity and the self-hosting ecosystem help the ecosystem score. SEO/web authority is 28. 公司 distribution is 30, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 90; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 45 and Features 45 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
45 I2VGen-XL
排名 45 / 48
Alibaba Vilab 47
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Open weights image-to-video research, historical baseline, open-model comparison
Quality 58 x 24%
Features 53 x 16%
证据 confidence 90 x 6%
Maturity 38 x 12%
Ecosystem 39 x 10%

排名 45 reflects an overall score / 47. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are 证据 confidence 90. Quality is scored at 58 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 53, mainly from I2v, Open 权重s. Price/access is 30; current access is Open 权重s, Research Only. Ecosystem heat is 39. Because it is open, GitHub activity and the self-hosting ecosystem help the ecosystem score. SEO/web authority is 38. 公司 distribution is 30, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 90; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 58 and Features 53 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
46 VASA
排名 46 / 48
Microsoft Research 47
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Research talking-face research, audio-driven portrait video, avatar category context
Quality 62 x 24%
Web authority 86 x 10%
Features 37 x 16%
Ecosystem 54 x 10%
Maturity 38 x 12%

排名 46 reflects an overall score / 47. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Web authority 86. Quality is scored at 62 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 37, mainly from Audio Driven Video, Portrait Animation, Research Only. Price/access is 6; current access is Research Only. Ecosystem heat is 54. Closed models are not assigned zero GitHub traction; GitHub is marked n/a. SEO/web authority is 86, with 79 sampled sitemap URLs as a public visibility signal. 公司 distribution is 20, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 75; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 62 and Features 37 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
47 DAMO Text-to-Video
排名 47 / 48
Alibaba Damo 44
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Open weights historical baseline, early T2V comparison
Quality 50 x 24%
Features 53 x 16%
Maturity 38 x 12%
Ecosystem 45 x 10%
证据 confidence 75 x 6%

排名 47 reflects an overall score / 44. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. Quality is scored at 50 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 53, mainly from T2v, Open 权重s. Price/access is 30; current access is Open 权重s, Research Only. Ecosystem heat is 45. Open model needs non-GitHub source metrics or a confirmed canonical repository. SEO/web authority is 38. 公司 distribution is 30, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 75; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 50 and Features 53 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score
48 Zeroscope
排名 48 / 48
Zeroscope Community 43
Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live...
Open weights historical open baseline, early T2V comparison
Quality 48 x 24%
Features 53 x 16%
Maturity 38 x 12%
Ecosystem 45 x 10%
证据 confidence 75 x 6%

排名 48 reflects an overall score / 43. Provisional quality proxy based on official/research evidence and catalogue presence; exact external rank requires live leaderboard/API collection. Quality is scored at 48 from public benchmark or leaderboard evidence where available. Feature depth is 53, mainly from T2v, Open 权重s. Price/access is 30; current access is Open 权重s, Research Only. Ecosystem heat is 45. Open model needs non-GitHub source metrics or a confirmed canonical repository. SEO/web authority is 28. 公司 distribution is 30, which matters because large apps, APIs, or creator tools can make a model easier to find and use. 证据 confidence is 75; remaining gaps include live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality, live Arena AI rank/score by modality. It does not rank higher because Quality 48 and Features 53 still trails stronger alternatives or needs fresher proof.

provisional / medium confidence
live Artificial Analysis rank/Elo by modality; live Arena AI rank/score by modality; independent side-by-side review score

评分权重

总分来自评分数据集,按权重合成为 0-100 分。

维度权重使用依据
model_quality_proxy24%External benchmark and leaderboard evidence, plus quality proxy notes when live benchmark data is incomplete.
capability_depth16%Supported workflows such as T2V, I2V, V2V, references, editing, native audio, API access, and open weights where present.
access_and_pricing12%Public web/API access, aggregator routes, free tier and pricing notes, regional availability, and pricing gaps.
version_maturity12%Release history, current version events, official docs, news/version monitoring, and recency.
ecosystem_popularity10%GitHub stars/forks/activity for open models, third-party catalogues, adoption signals, and explicit n/a handling for closed models.
web_authority10%SEO/web authority records, reachable product/company domains, robots/sitemap data, and sampled sitemap footprint.
company_distribution10%公司 profile, product distribution channels, consumer apps, cloud/API distribution, and enterprise reach.
source_confidence6%First-party links, external benchmark support, freshness, missing-data gaps, and manual provisional status.

按场景选择

Use the full ranking first, then narrow it by what you actually need to make.

Best for beginners

Easy web products with strong access, clear entry points, and broad consumer workflows.

  1. Pika 排名 18 / 73 score / Closed

    Good fit because social video effects, quick ideation, image animation. Scenario match 6 signal(s), Price/access 70.

  2. Seedance 排名 1 / 92 score / Closed

    Good fit because cinematic short clips, multi-shot storytelling, audio-video generation. Scenario match 4 signal(s), Price/access 88.

  3. SkyReels 排名 10 / 84 score / Open weights

    Good fit because keyframe generation, video extension, reference control. Scenario match 3 signal(s), Price/access 100.

  4. Runway Gen 排名 5 / 87 score / Closed

    Good fit because production workflows, image-to-video, video editing. Scenario match 3 signal(s), Price/access 88.

  5. PixVerse 排名 7 / 86 score / Closed

    Good fit because fast creator clips, first-last-frame transitions, video extension. Scenario match 3 signal(s), Price/access 88.

Best for ads

Tools that fit short-form marketing, product clips, references, and fast iteration.

  1. Seedance 排名 1 / 92 score / Closed

    Good fit because cinematic short clips, multi-shot storytelling, audio-video generation. Scenario match 3 signal(s), Features 100.

  2. Kling 排名 2 / 92 score / Closed

    Good fit because consumer creator workflows, native audio clips, storyboarded short video. Scenario match 2 signal(s), Features 97.

  3. Luma Ray 排名 8 / 85 score / Closed

    Good fit because cinematic clips, multi-keyframe direction, professional pipelines. Scenario match 2 signal(s), Features 100.

  4. SkyReels 排名 10 / 84 score / Open weights

    Good fit because keyframe generation, video extension, reference control. Scenario match 2 signal(s), Features 100.

  5. PixVerse 排名 7 / 86 score / Closed

    Good fit because fast creator clips, first-last-frame transitions, video extension. Scenario match 2 signal(s), Features 93.

Best for cinematic realism

Frontier models for realistic motion, camera language, visual quality, and storytelling.

  1. Seedance 排名 1 / 92 score / Closed

    Good fit because cinematic short clips, multi-shot storytelling, audio-video generation. Scenario match 4 signal(s), Quality 96.

  2. Runway Gen 排名 5 / 87 score / Closed

    Good fit because production workflows, image-to-video, video editing. Scenario match 2 signal(s), Quality 81.

  3. Kling 排名 2 / 92 score / Closed

    Good fit because consumer creator workflows, native audio clips, storyboarded short video. Scenario match 1 signal(s), Quality 91.

  4. Veo 排名 6 / 86 score / Closed

    Good fit because cinematic generation, image-referenced clips, vertical short-form video. Scenario match 1 signal(s), Quality 95.

  5. Wan 排名 4 / 87 score / Open weights

    Good fit because open-weight benchmarking, developer workflows, image-to-video. Scenario match 1 signal(s), Quality 92.

Best for anime/stylized

Good fits for anime, illustration, character looks, stylized clips, and creator effects.

  1. Kling 排名 2 / 92 score / Closed

    Good fit because consumer creator workflows, native audio clips, storyboarded short video. Scenario match 2 signal(s), Features 97.

  2. Vidu 排名 14 / 79 score / Closed

    Good fit because native audio-video stories, short drama clips, narrative ads. Scenario match 3 signal(s), Features 78.

  3. Hailuo 排名 12 / 79 score / Closed

    Good fit because fast short clips, complex motion, image-to-video. Scenario match 3 signal(s), Features 72.

  4. Seedance 排名 1 / 92 score / Closed

    Good fit because cinematic short clips, multi-shot storytelling, audio-video generation. Scenario match 1 signal(s), Features 100.

  5. Runway Gen 排名 5 / 87 score / Closed

    Good fit because production workflows, image-to-video, video editing. Scenario match 1 signal(s), Features 100.

Best for API/developers

模型s with API access, aggregator routes, or developer-friendly distribution.

  1. Seedance 排名 1 / 92 score / Closed

    Good fit because cinematic short clips, multi-shot storytelling, audio-video generation. Scenario match 2 signal(s), Price/access 88.

  2. PixVerse 排名 7 / 86 score / Closed

    Good fit because fast creator clips, first-last-frame transitions, video extension. Scenario match 2 signal(s), Price/access 88.

  3. LTX Video 排名 3 / 89 score / Open weights

    Good fit because open-weight audio-video, local deployment, custom LoRA workflows. Scenario match 1 signal(s), Price/access 96.

  4. Veo 排名 6 / 86 score / Closed

    Good fit because cinematic generation, image-referenced clips, vertical short-form video. Scenario match 2 signal(s), Price/access 78.

  5. SkyReels 排名 10 / 84 score / Open weights

    Good fit because keyframe generation, video extension, reference control. Scenario match 1 signal(s), Price/access 100.

Best for open-source/self-hosted

Open-weight or open-source options where GitHub activity, license clarity, and local inference matter.

  1. LTX Video 排名 3 / 89 score / Open weights

    Good fit because open-weight audio-video, local deployment, custom LoRA workflows. Scenario match 5 signal(s), Ecosystem 100.

  2. HunyuanVideo 排名 9 / 84 score / Open weights

    Good fit because open-weight testing, developer experiments, self-hosted video generation. Scenario match 5 signal(s), Ecosystem 100.

  3. Mochi 排名 21 / 67 score / Open weights

    Good fit because open-source benchmarking, local text-to-video, community fine-tuning. Scenario match 5 signal(s), Ecosystem 100.

  4. CogVideoX 排名 15 / 75 score / Open weights

    Good fit because open-source benchmarking, self-hosted T2V, self-hosted I2V. Scenario match 4 signal(s), Ecosystem 100.

  5. Pyramid Flow 排名 39 / 52 score / Open weights

    Good fit because open research, T2V/I2V baseline tests. Scenario match 5 signal(s), Ecosystem 100.

Best for native audio

Choices that mention audio-video generation, sound generation, lip sync, or native audio workflows.

  1. Kling 排名 2 / 92 score / Closed

    Good fit because consumer creator workflows, native audio clips, storyboarded short video. Scenario match 6 signal(s), Features 97.

  2. Vidu 排名 14 / 79 score / Closed

    Good fit because native audio-video stories, short drama clips, narrative ads. Scenario match 6 signal(s), Features 78.

  3. Seedance 排名 1 / 92 score / Closed

    Good fit because cinematic short clips, multi-shot storytelling, audio-video generation. Scenario match 4 signal(s), Features 100.

  4. SkyReels 排名 10 / 84 score / Open weights

    Good fit because keyframe generation, video extension, reference control. Scenario match 4 signal(s), Features 100.

  5. PixVerse 排名 7 / 86 score / Closed

    Good fit because fast creator clips, first-last-frame transitions, video extension. Scenario match 4 signal(s), Features 93.

Best for editing workflow

Tools better suited to extending, editing, transforming, or refining existing footage.

  1. Seedance 排名 1 / 92 score / Closed

    Good fit because cinematic short clips, multi-shot storytelling, audio-video generation. Scenario match 5 signal(s), Features 100.

  2. Runway Gen 排名 5 / 87 score / Closed

    Good fit because production workflows, image-to-video, video editing. Scenario match 4 signal(s), Features 100.

  3. Grok Imagine Video 排名 11 / 81 score / Closed

    Good fit because image-to-video with audio, fast mobile generation, Grok users. Scenario match 4 signal(s), Features 96.

  4. Kling 排名 2 / 92 score / Closed

    Good fit because consumer creator workflows, native audio clips, storyboarded short video. Scenario match 3 signal(s), Features 97.

  5. SkyReels 排名 10 / 84 score / Open weights

    Good fit because keyframe generation, video extension, reference control. Scenario match 3 signal(s), Features 100.

头部模型为什么排名靠前

These short summaries translate the parameters into plain buying advice.

排名 1 92

Seedance

排名 1 reflects an overall score / 92. Strong matched external evidence: Artificial Analysis and Arena snapshots place Seedance 2.0 near the top; Vercel AI Gateway snapshot shows leading video usage share. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Qua...

公司: ByteDance

source-backed / high confidence

排名 2 92

Kling

排名 2 reflects an overall score / 92. External leaderboard coverage is strong, with Arena snapshot listing Kling v3 near leading I2V systems and Artificial Analysis tracking Kling variants. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 91 and Fea...

公司: Kuaishou

source-backed / high confidence

排名 3 89

LTX Video

排名 3 reflects an overall score / 89. LTX has open repository evidence and third-party catalogue/leaderboard presence; live score snapshots are required for exact rank. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 79 and Features 100. Quality is...

公司: Lightricks

source-backed / high confidence

排名 4 87

Wan

排名 4 reflects an overall score / 87. Wan appears in Artificial Analysis and Arena snapshots, and the open repository/paper provide reproducible public evidence. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 92 and Features 76. Quality is scored...

公司: Alibaba Group

source-backed / high confidence

排名 5 87

Runway Gen

排名 5 reflects an overall score / 87. Runway has mature product evidence and public leaderboard presence; exact current model rank needs live leaderboard collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 81 and Features 100. Quality is sc...

公司: Runway

source-backed / high confidence

排名 6 86

Veo

排名 6 reflects an overall score / 86. Google Gemini Omni Flash/Veo-family entries lead the Artificial Analysis audio-video snapshot and rank highly in Arena/Vercel snapshots. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 95 and Features 78. Quali...

公司: Google DeepMind

source-backed / high confidence

排名 7 86

PixVerse

排名 7 reflects an overall score / 86. PixVerse variants appear in Artificial Analysis and Arena snapshots; V6 official samples and API docs support current capability claims. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 87 and Features 93. Quali...

公司: PixVerse

source-backed / high confidence

排名 8 85

Luma Ray

排名 8 reflects an overall score / 85. Arena snapshot places Luma Ray 3 in the top-ten I2V region; official Ray docs support high-control workflow evidence. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 82 and Features 100. Quality is scored at 82...

公司: Luma AI

source-backed / high confidence

排名 9 84

HunyuanVideo

排名 9 reflects an overall score / 84. HunyuanVideo is tracked by public leaderboards and has strong open-weight repository evidence, but current frontier placement needs live collection. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 80 and Maturi...

公司: Tencent

source-backed / high confidence

排名 10 84

SkyReels

排名 10 reflects an overall score / 84. SkyReels has open-weight evidence and public model-host presence, with exact live leaderboard position still pending. For a buyer, the biggest positives are Quality 77 and Features 100. Quality is scored at 7...

公司: Skywork AI / Kunlun

source-backed / high confidence

数据来源

Ranking inputs come from GitHub open-source metrics, SEO and web authority collection, news/version events, external benchmark snapshots such as Artificial Analysis and Arena where available, official product documentation, company profiles, and manual provisional research notes.

缺失数据说明

证据/confidence is shown for every item as source-backed, provisional, or missing live data. Closed-source models show GitHub as n/a and are not punished as zero-star projects; open models use repository stars, forks, recency, license clarity, and ecosystem availability as a bounded popularity signal.

为什么排名有意义

The ranking explanation combines quality proxy, feature depth, access/pricing, maturity, open ecosystem, web authority, company distribution, and source confidence so users can see why a model sits above or below nearby alternatives.

下一步对比

Pairwise pages are better when the decision is use-case specific, such as Seedance vs Kling, Veo vs Runway, or Wan vs HunyuanVideo.

打开对比